Showing posts with label web. Show all posts
Showing posts with label web. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

WAAL 2008: Next generation virtual reference


  • Steve Frye, UW-Madison College Library
  • Mark Beatty, WiLS
  • Valerie Beech, Marquette University
  • John Jentz, Marquette University

IM/chat at UW-Madison, and future of virtual reference

  • Steve:
  • UW-Madison started online reference in 2002 with Convey software
  • Needed to change software, and thought we'd look at new vendors
  • Instead, library powers that be asked us to look at virtual reference as a whole first
  • 2006 started with blended service (chat/IM)
  • "Ask a Librarian" link ubiquitous throughout library webpages
  • Decided early on that service would be staffed at desks, with staff of various levels
  • Needed to be stable, and simple - if needed more than 5 minutes of training, too much
  • Video: watching collaboration on virtual ref between reference staff
  • Choosing software - some useful websites
  • Will add Chat button within OPAC when "no results found"
  • Discussion btw. Writing Center, IT, libraries, tutoring service re: creating virtual Information Commons
  • Using Jing - free to download, screencasting for multi-step processes, free online hosting with URLs you can send patron
  • Takes 7 steps to order another book from another UW System library
  • #1: Virtual ref isn't the point - it's just another communication channel - we don't say "telephonic reference"
  • #2: What is it we do? - if you're thinking about doing it or not, does it fit in your mission? - 1876 Samuel Greene quote on what librarians do - doesn't mention a desk, or having to be there with a patron
  • #3: What do we call what we do? - TAIGA Forum 2006 - library directors - "Within the next 5 years..." - end of reference - library role is to project specialized services into research and learning workflows - Steve: they seem unable to conceive of "reference" beyond the desk
  • If you were building a new library, would you have a ref desk? If not, why do you have one now?
  • What is the future of providing support to students and faculty doing research? Bright.
  • Are we in the buggy business? Or the transportation business?

IM at Marquette University

  • IM = commercial free; VR = expensive client-based software (aka "chat")
  • 2006: John learns of Meebo; also looked at Pidgin (was GAIM) and Trillian
  • 2007: Use both Tutor.com ($$$) and Meebo
  • Meebo: entirely web-based (no download), allows anonymous chat
  • Students are used to being interrupted during reference, so prioritization of modality a non-issue
  • Hand-written log for ref stats, although can keep transcripts
  • In 3 months, IM has become 7.7% of ref Qs; less e-mail (fairly steady); less still VR
  • Think IM may level off at 10%
  • Types: ref (substantive) - mainly, ref (technical), directional (technical), directional (non-technical)
  • Minority of rude, impatient patrons
  • Ref staff really like IM; don't really like Tutor.com (complex national scheduling, etc.)
  • [Live demo]
  • Meebo sidebar in Firefox, so you can monitor as staffperson

QuestionPoint at WiLS

  • Finally able to do quality control - virtual ref staff previously worked in a vacuum
  • Both academic and public library patrons
  • AskAway
  • QuestionPoint introduced Qwidget one month ago - availability indicator, can re-direct to email for off-hours, or link to other live coverage when you aren't available
  • Starts anonymous; can enter email address; can still get a transcript if they don't share email with staff
  • [Live demo - email icon is small and not really obvious, but otherwise looks good!]
  • NWTC using on homepage, and integrated into LibGuides
  • I was able to get it into a MySpace page, and a regular Facebook profile (not a Facebook Page)
  • Would hate to think that librarians wouldn't do something because they were afraid of being inundated by reference questions
  • Could take a while if we ever need changes made to the software; QP is huge consortium with variety of opinions (ex: co-browsing - librarian can take over patron's desktop - Mark: this is dead; others insist they need it)
  • Steve: VR vendors should have talked to users, not librarians - too many features, it became unstable
  • Audience: I tried using public library chat, and Michigan person answered - I needed local knowledge, was referred to email
  • Mark: Garbage In, Garbage Out - need to make sure you put as much information as possible on your own website, so distant librarians can help. Signs in doors when closed - "here's how to get help online"

[Image: http://www.library.wisc.edu/ask]

Friday, October 19, 2007

WLA 2007: The 411 on Mashups

Presented by Julie Fricke, Reference and Web Resource Librarian, Lawrence University.

Mashups are applications that use more than one source to create something new. Mapping mashups are about 32% of what's out there right now, but photo and news mashups are becoming more popular. Check the Programmable Web for more info.

Mashups are:
  • easy to use
  • easy to find
  • easy to manipulate
  • the future of web stuff
Examples:
How do I make one?
  • add this app (point & click - like iGoogle's widgets, Facebook apps)
  • clone (yahoo pipes is an example)
  • program (server side - Google API for example)
Implications for libraries:
  • Intellectual property: know when you can use the data or site, so you're not violating copyright; make sure you know when it's okay to remix
  • Copyright: check for Creative Commons licenses
  • Provenance: pay attention to the origin of the info and authority
  • Scale and dependency: can you get support for using the mashup?
  • Keeping up!
More info is available at wlamash on del.icio.us, the Programmable Web (link above), and mashups.com. Julie's presentation will be available online soon on the conference web site. Look at dapper and datamashups for help with creating quick and easy mashups. Can't wait to dabble!